Many different
governments have carried out policies of affirmative action to compensate for
past discrimination of racial minorities. Supporters declare that it shatters
the glass ceiling, allowing certain ethnic group to enter higher economic and
social status. Adding on, affirmative action creates a classroom of diverse
ethnicities and makes up for the pure luck involved in birth by providing more
opportunities to those who aren’t so lucky. On the other hand, opposing views
point out how such policies only benefit the powerful and wealthy households of
such ethnicities that have been historically discriminated. Further on,
affirmative action cannot be justified as it’s merely an extension of
discrimination by ethnicity and race. Professor Ashwini Deshpande further
supports Affirmative Action by talking about how it will have a trickle-down
effect with social minorities in decision making positions and how it will
level the playing field. She also rebuts to a few points, such as the criticism
that AA only further stigmatizes these minorities. She points out that AA
counters the current stigma that exists independently and that critics should
shift their focus to successful cases like the castes of India. She claims that
the criticism about AA being regressive is merely a myth. On the opposing side,
professor Lino A. Graglia states that AA is inconsistent with an important
value that humanity upholds, equality. He claims the actual problem is that
certain ethnic groups lack in certain abilities and that the society is merely
trying to cover this fact up.








0 개의 댓글:
댓글 쓰기